The Oven

Project World => Win10PE SE HomePage => Topic started by: enduser on June 14, 2020, 03:35:06 PM

Title: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 14, 2020, 03:35:06 PM
Hey Guys,

First: I am no programmer, I am No coding expert i am just a small enduser who would like use things only. I have no other intension.
Therefore please made instructions as easy as possible:)
To the problem:
I createt an winp se-.iso. It works so far. It seems that the apps i use are on an  y-Drive? wich is mountet at start? So it seems for me.
The Problem is now, that even on normal mbr-boot?, sometimes the y-drive with the apps is also not there.
If i try uefi/secure -boot then there are no y-drive and apps on it at all. I have only a few standard apps like it seemed, but no apps on y-drive...
How can i make now, that the y-drive and the apps on it are allways and exspecialy in uefi-boot are present?

regards
 
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 14, 2020, 04:59:39 PM
Hi enduser,

Quote from: enduser on June 14, 2020, 03:35:06 PM
It seems that the apps i use are on an  y-Drive?
default yes

Quote from: enduser on June 14, 2020, 03:35:06 PM
wich is mountet at start?
no or yes, up to condition ...

Quote from: enduser on June 14, 2020, 03:35:06 PM
I have only a few standard apps like it seemed,
-->
Short answer:

on Build\"CdDrive - X: - Y:" Plugin
 Enable "Run All from Ram"

Let us know the result.  :cheers:

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 14, 2020, 08:41:25 PM
Thanks a lot Lancelot for this hint!
If i do so, would this raise the amount of ram the target system needed to start the iso?
My goal is to have such low requirement as possible for running the project.
This brings me to another question: To reach this goal is it better to use x86 or 64bit build?
If an x86 build is is used on an x64 target system, has this somehow limitations?
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 15, 2020, 10:31:53 AM
Hi enduser,

Spend some time (few days) with the project and test yourself to see which options fit your goals.  :cheers:

You will get better and faster answers with your tests instead of a reply on a topic during the learning period.

That is one of the reasons projects created with many options instead of a simple builder. :wink:

New PE end-users always have similar startup questions for 10 years TheOven.org created,
 after spending a short time they quickly figure out themselves.  :cool:

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: cdob on June 15, 2020, 11:24:22 AM
Quote from: enduser on June 14, 2020, 08:41:25 PM
To reach this goal is it better to use x86 or 64bit build?
If an x86 build is is used on an x64 target system
At UEFI uses the same bitness to boot.
Almost all x64 machine uses a 64bit UEFI. Use a x64 PE then.
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 12:22:38 PM
Hey,
thanks guys.

Sure i am on it with self tests, like the whole time.
I change things, create new ISOs. Test them and thats the way i learn a lots of things.
To speed up my learning curve and that i don t have to invent the wheel each time its neverthless
very helpfull to just answer some basic questions, wich might be easy to answer for the experts; )

So wich project needs more ram on the target system: an x86-build.iso, or an x64.build.iso?
And also again, will i have limitations if i boot an createt x86-winp-se.iso on an x84 target system - the questions is for mbr-boot and for uefi-boot.
To answer this questions help to make more specific goal-orientet tests: )

regards


Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: James on June 15, 2020, 12:51:29 PM
x86 is usually smaller (File Size) and requires less system memory to load
x86 will not boot in UEFI Mode - except on systems with "ATOM" processors
x86 will boot x86 & x64 systems in Legacy (MBR/Bios) mode - if Legacy/CSM Support enabled in Bios
Keeps Options to a the minimum as possible to insure ability to Load WinPE into Low System Memory PC's
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 01:12:17 PM
Thank you James!

Sorry, its quoting allways the whole text, but i want only quote several pasages.
So i must make this this way:

"x86 is usually smaller (File Size) and requires less system memory to load"

Exactly this i wantet to know. I already sugestet that this will be the case...

"x86 will not boot in UEFI Mode - except on systems with "ATOM" processors"

Interesting that expection here is with atom processors. But exactly this i have feared.
I also think on my lazy friends with creating the system. It should also rin on their machines, for diagnostic and recovery tasks.
An female friend for example bought this teribble surface and she don t listen to me to give this crap back. Its so beatiful and so light and the great display and stuff she answers. Girls are not thinking logical in the most case, you know: )
But she is exact the case, becouse my project should also boot on uefi -machines. If i have this correct in mind, it was not possible to disable uefi on this surface. Maybe it was also not even possible to disable secure boot.
I would never buy such a crap like microsoft-surface....Terrible syste, really horrible!

"x86 will boot x86 & x64 systems in Legacy (MBR/Bios) mode - if Legacy/CSM Support enabled in Bios"
Ok, then i have to create an lightweight x86-project and an lightweight x64 -project that i can work with all possible systems i will be confrontet in the field (my lacy friends computers:)

regards



Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
Update1:

Problems occured. The x86-build gives me a bluescreen with the error "multiprocessor configuration is not supportet".
Can t be. Bad joke?: )
As you can not just use actual win10.iso images for build, i used the recomendet version: Win10_1809_German_x32.
I also know there is an project arin or similiar with wich you can  use atcual win10.IOs. But this leads to other problems. So i must use the spoken old ISOs of Windows10 for the project.
With the x64 Version of this old 1809 version: "Win10_1809Oct_v2_German_x64", build is working, no bluescreen with error.
Strange, isn t it?
The only thing i can try on this point is useing a still older 32bit Version of Windows10. I still have this Version: "10240.16384.150709-1700.TH1_CLIENTENTERPRISE_S_EVAL_X86FRE_DE-DE"
If its also not working, then i stuck on this point, till the problem wich leads to this multiprocessor-nonsens BSD is solved...
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 04:24:28 PM
Update 2: Stranger things :)

The builded project with "10240.16384.150709-1700.TH1_CLIENTENTERPRISE_S_EVAL_X86FRE_DE-DE".iso, works.
No multiprocessor bluescreen like if i use "Win10_1809_German_x32".iso.
I don t understund that.
Strange, but so far so good. I got only a error on driver path/patch/inject -something, while building the project with ""10240.16384.150709-1700.TH1_CLIENTENTERPRISE_S_EVAL_X86FRE_DE-DE"".iso,
, but the buidling -process goes on to the end and the iso seems to work. At least i don t get the spoken BSOD; )
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 15, 2020, 04:51:28 PM
Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
Win10_1809_German_x32.
I am downloading Win10_1809_German_x32.iso now

Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
I also know there is an project azin or similiar with wich you can  use atcual win10.IOs. But this leads to other problems.
what are these "other problems" ?

Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
Strange, isn t it?
not much, life  :lol:
 we can not test all projects with all languages and with all none-rtm sources,
  I mostly test with en-us source, till one day one report something with another source & lang
      (eg. now downloading Win10_1809_German_x32.iso  :lol:)

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 15, 2020, 06:01:29 PM
Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 04:24:28 PM
No multiprocessor bluescreen like if i use "Win10_1809_German_x32".iso.

just downloaded and tested, works fine with 1 processor 1 core, also 2 processor 2 cores (=4)  ......

Tip: You can enable \"Basic Project" Plugin to make Basic test builds (mostly to test different sources) which will be faster  :wink:

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 06:06:43 PM

Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
Win10_1809_German_x32.
I am downloading Win10_1809_German_x32.iso now

Sorry for make you work. That was not my intention, but thx a lot for your help.

Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
I also know there is an project azin or similiar with wich you can  use atcual win10.IOs. But this leads to other problems.
what are these "other problems" ?

Had some error messages and building stops. From this point, i was goeing back to 1809.64bit wich was working.
Did no further investigation becouse becouse lack of knoweldge and used again the last working method. Typical enduser behaviour: )

Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
Strange, isn t it?
not much, life  :lol:
 we can not test all projects with all languages and with all none-rtm sources,
  I mostly test with en-us source, till one day one report something with another source & lang
      (eg. now downloading Win10_1809_German_x32.iso  :lol:)

:turtle:
[/quote]

Oh, i should i also mention, that added to the scripts from win10p-se, scripts for tools wich i need for working.
I can t of course not exclude that perhaps some of this script is responsible for the spoken error.
It should not, but life...you never know what happens:)
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 06:09:37 PM
Sorry for the quoting disaster above: )

"You can enable \"Basic Project" Plugin to make Basic test builds (mostly to test different sources) which will be faster  "

Sure, i also had a similar suspect. I test a build with basic scripts only.

Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 15, 2020, 06:25:12 PM
Hi enduser,

I do not know which "Plugins" you add.
 We call them Plugins since they will only work projects that use Plugins
  (for today: Gena Azin-WimBuilder Azin-LiveSystemPro Win7PESE Win8PESE Win8.1SE Win10PESE)
    They will not work with other projects ...

Further write Plugin  :wink:

*
> Had some error messages and building stops. From this point, i was goeing back to 1809.64bit wich was working.
> Did no further investigation becouse becouse lack of knoweldge and used again the last working method. Typical enduser behaviour: )

Well I am trying to get things to work out of the box knowing Typical enduser behaviour,
 but if I do not have problem here I need some info from end user side  :wink: to figure out special condition at end-user side.

*
I do not know which Plugins you add, but you seem to drive fast and crash faster  :lol:

Take it easy.
 step by step.  :thumbsup:

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 15, 2020, 10:22:15 PM
Hey Lancelot,

thx a lot for your work, your explanation and especialy for your patience; )

"I do not know which "Plugins" you add."

It was some plugins from my former win7pse -build.
But wich plugins it was exactly, i also don t know anymore, becouse i copied them just in the folders wich i think it belongs, for example filemanagers i copied to file-tasks and so on.
It gona get funy to try to find out wich plugins it were excatly.
I think i don t notice the problem with the bluescreen, becouse of multi processor configuration wich i get actual, becouse i used this older win10.32 -bit -entprise image wich works for some reasons wich i don t know.
With this 1809.x86 -image it is not working.
I also tried basic build. Also with this build i get this multiprocessor config -bluescreen.
This time, i made an foto from it and attached it.
If i understood you correct, basic-project, should override plugin -settings and useing only basic plugins. So this bluescreen shouldn t have appeard.
But i get this blurescreen. Very strange..


"Well I am trying to get things to work out of the box knowing Typical enduser behaviour,
 but if I do not have problem here I need some info from end user side  :wink: to figure out special condition at end-user side."

Comprehensible:) Thats all things wich can be done, after the major goal is reached.
My workflow is first to solve the task, then i make additional tests.
At the moment i have unfortunatly problems to finish the task becouse of this mentioned bluescreen.
I can go now back to use again the working enterprise x86.iso for bulding wich works, or find out why i have this strange not logical problem...
So, the best is step by step, you are right!

regards


Edit: qr-code from the foto removed becouse i don t know if it can contain sensitive informations, but propably i am only to paranoid; )

Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 15, 2020, 10:38:26 PM
Hi enduser,

step by step, have a fresh start  :wink:

- Extract Win10PE_SE_2020-03-28.zip to an empty folder
- Start builder
- Use Utils\"Update Win10PESE (Exact and Secure)" Plugin --> Click "Update (Download + Copy)" Button

Make a working build and test with an emulator to see if it boots fine on virtual
we have
VirtualTest\"VirtualBox Virtualization" Plugin
VirtualTest\"VMware Virtualization" Plugin
to test easily
(After Build, use small green play button on Plugin UI)

After you can get Win10PESE boot with Virtual, you can dig more.

The above steps are written to ALL "Typical end-users" for years and work fine to figure out things.

*
Well there is no clear information on your reply about questions I ask,
 as written before,
  Take it easy,
     slowly with step by step  :wink:

:turtle:

Edit:
https://errortools.com/windows/how-to-fix-multiprocessor_configuration_not_supported-error-in-windows-10/
https://windowsreport.com/multiprocessor_configuration_not_supported-windows-10/
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 16, 2020, 03:32:16 PM
Back 2 basic but struggle with this BSOD continues; (

In the meantime, i did the most you recomendt.
I was goeing back to the original archive, extractet it again and statet to build with the 1809.x86.iso.

"- Use Utils\"Update Win10PESE (Exact and Secure)" Plugin --> Click "Update (Download + Copy)" Button"

This was the only thing wich i did not. I check do this yet, but i don t think that it will solve the problem.
The result is at the moment, i get again this spoken bluescreen.
The Image is working correctly in virtual box. I onlny get this bluescreen with real hardware....
Is maybe my 1809.x86 -iso defective? But i don t think so.

"Well there is no clear information on your reply about questions I as"

Maybe i over read it. What do you want to know? Sorry.

Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 16, 2020, 08:01:18 PM
Hi enduser,

let's go step by step

*
Quote from: enduser on June 16, 2020, 03:32:16 PM
"- Use Utils\"Update Win10PESE (Exact and Secure)" Plugin --> Click "Update (Download + Copy)" Button"
Good  :thumbsup:

*
Quote from: enduser on June 16, 2020, 03:32:16 PM
The Image is working correctly in virtual box.
Good news.

*
Quote from: enduser on June 16, 2020, 03:32:16 PM
"Well there is no clear information on your reply about questions I as"

Maybe i over read it. What do you want to know? Sorry.
one of them:
Quote from: Lancelot on June 15, 2020, 04:51:28 PM
Quote from: enduser on June 15, 2020, 03:41:21 PM
I also know there is an project azin or similiar with wich you can  use atcual win10.IOs. But this leads to other problems.
what are these "other problems" ?
?????????????


*********
First Step:
since x86 fail, and following your bsod picture ... :

Enable "Basic Project" Plugin + "make sure Run All From Ram enabled" + Try with Win10_1809_German_x64 source

only 3 parameters with default project  :wink:

you can get rtm source from https://tb.rg-adguard.net/public.php
 (which I and most regular-users around %99.9 test with)

I do not know how you boot or prepare boot media,
 you can prepare your ufd (usb flash disk) with Virtual Test\"Copy to USB-Device" Plugin
   (after Build (BigBluePlay), use small green play button with \Virtual Test\"Copy to USB-Device" Plugin
    ufd will be formatted ...
    )
 
+ first make sure you boot fine on vbox
+ and let's see how it goes on your real hw test
+ and ?????????????  :wink:

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 16, 2020, 09:01:39 PM
-
fixed (edit) my previous reply
since you will be testing with Win10_1809_German_x64 source
better use Virtual Test\"Copy to USB-Device" Plugin

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 16, 2020, 10:30:02 PM
Thank you Lancelot!

Win10_1809_German_x64 source is working. I have only with 1809.x86 this bsod.

Ah, ok. The questions wich problems exactly occure with arin/azin?
I haven t answered becouse i don t know it anymore.
I would try again it, if i have a working building system wich i am working atm on it.
Don t open to many constrcutions sites at once, or you will get lost - enduser wisdom; )

I use for booting image a kind of starting system wich i found on the net: easy2boot
Its easy to use and it seems it seem work.

My real testhardware is by the way: Core7 3770K on an Asus Board with Z77 -Chipset.
Windows is installed as mbr not uefi. I use uefi only for live-system-tests.
Thanks for your instrcutions.
I test it and response.
If you need additional informations, just ask.

regards
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 16, 2020, 10:55:11 PM
Hi enduser,

*
Quote from: enduser on June 16, 2020, 10:30:02 PM
I use for booting image a kind of starting system wich i found on the net: easy2boot
I feel (not tested) 3rd party apps will be mostly ok with enabled "Run All from Ram"
 Still, there are Plugins provided by the project to be sure in case of failure. :wink:

follow "end-user wisdom  :wink:" , first try with the provided later test with others.  :thumbsup:


*
Quote from: enduser on June 16, 2020, 10:30:02 PM
If you need additional informations, just ask.
For now, I do not want to distract attention, step by step  :thumbsup:

Quote from: enduser on June 16, 2020, 10:30:02 PM
Win10_1809_German_x64 source is working.
Good  :great:

I remember you wanted x86 to have lower ram requirement for your tasks with some apps ? (I remember they were small number of apps but you did not gave detail)

Question is: do you have enough ram for your tasks when using Win10_1809_German_x64 ?
do your apps ?? for your tasks works fine ???

:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: enduser on June 18, 2020, 02:56:50 PM
The endusers diary -The fight against the X86_multiCPU-bsd: )

Hey Lancelot first knight of the round:)

I worked everything up like a checklist.
No matter what i did, i allways get this multcpu-bsd if i tried to make an X86-build.
In virtualbox is allways running fine, but not on my real hardware.
But there is an exption:
With this ISO:" 10240.16384.150709-1700.TH1_CLIENTENTERPRISE_S_EVAL_X86FRE_DE-DE" X86_build is working. No BSD, i repaet, no bsd:)
With all other ISOs wich came in question, i had no luck and i think i testet them all.

Status: X64-build is working fine. X-86-build is for reassons i don t know only possible with this ISO "10240.16384.150709-1700.TH1_CLIENTENTERPRISE_S_EVAL_X86FRE_DE-DE"

Its far from perfect, but for the moment i can life with it.

I also testet again azin project and notet the error down for you: "Install esd not supportet Use a RTM source with install.wim"
It seems there is an difference between rtm? source and esd?
Azin Project works fine with rtm sources like: "19041.264.200511-0456.vb_release_svc_refresh_CLIENTENTERPRISEEVAL_OEMRET_x86FRE_de-de" (But the result like all X86-builds has the bsd)
There was also to read, that you can convert wim in rtm -something?
Well, i remember that i did maybe something similar with the old win7pese-project. Its already to long ago, but i convertet something wim from the iso.
That was then the source for building, bit if i remember correctly, this extractet something, was much bigger then the source.iso.

As i startet now with win10pse, i decided to use only mountet win10-ISOs as source (if there is no important reason to do not).
Win10 can mountet ISOs out of the box and for buiding the live-systems, i use my SSD, becouse its so muuuuuuuuuch faster the my hdd.
But the space on my ssd is very valuable:) Therefore i try to use a less a possibe.

Now i am working on the final -project wich contains the apps i need as X86 and X64 -build.
Then i go deeper into the orgin problem of this thread: apps on y not present at uefi boot.
Then i test for the final project also your run all from ram -hint.
Lets see what happpens;)
I think this all is no sprint, its more  a marathon.
Things needs time and your are learning by doeing.
I learned in the last few days many things i don t know about the project.
Thank you for sharing your knoweldge with me!

Quote
I remember you wanted x86 to have lower ram requirement for your tasks with some apps ? (I remember they were small number of apps but you did not gave detail)

Question is: do you have enough ram for your tasks when using Win10_1809_German_x64 ?
do your apps ?? for your tasks works fine ???
:turtle:

I have 16gb of ram. I think and i hope thats enough: )
All apps i`ve testet working fine.
But i am just to order the apps and decide whats i need and whats not.
The most important was that trueimage is working, becouse backup and restore is one of the most important tasks for me.
So for me, i have less sorrows becouse the amount of ram needed, but for my friends an others.
Therefore the plan is to create an lightweight X84 -build and an more complex X64 build.



p.s.: Plugins i still looking for: chrome-plugin, opera-plugin, verycrypt-plugin wich has the actual version.
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 19, 2020, 12:06:32 AM
Hi endusers,


As far as I know, RTM sources always has install.wim (I download from TechBench by WZT)

Since it is easy to convert install.esd to install.wim,
 but complicated for projects or cause speed down on build, install.wim is better for all and preferred with ALL projects.

+
Extracted Wim Folders is another subject different from instal.wim ......
 still, always have install.wim for ALL projects
  I update Win10PESE to work without Extracted Wim Folders only 3 months ago,
  good to see all goes fine on your side from "build" point of view. :thumbsup:


*
Quote from: enduser on June 18, 2020, 02:56:50 PM
Therefore the plan is to create an lightweight X84 -build and an more complex X64 build.
I will come back to current topic few days later with more x86 things to test.
Download Win10_1809Oct_v2_x86 and Win10_2004_x86 from TechBench to be ready for tests.
 (since TechBench provide RTM sources with install.wim they will work out of box  :wink:)

Meanwhile:
spend a fun time with your x64 things.

Quote from: enduser on June 18, 2020, 02:56:50 PM
p.s.: Plugins i still looking for: chrome-plugin, opera-plugin, verycrypt-plugin wich has the actual version.
check \Download\ Plugins  .... :wink:
See http://theoven.org/index.php?topic=1208

I remember there is veracrypt Plıugin
FireFox Plugin more popular and updated frequently (and Plugin already available)
 I am sure It will be easy to create Opera Plugin which I also like, I do not use Chrome but It should still be easy.

I prefer QTWeb on PE these days, it is very small and enough to browse from PE.

16 GB ram is enough  :lol: :lol: and I believe all x64 pc you will have enough ram to boot Win10PESE.

on the final product, remember changing Finals\PostConfig - Compression --> to Maximum, which will also gain some more ram
(but boring during tests  :lol: )

since you prefer "Run All From Ram", also check "FlatBoot" tutorials on the internet, which will require less ram ... (pros cons ... )

ps: Adding all 3 browsers will get size quite bigger, prefer only 1 of them, FireFox ready for the task.  :wink: QtWeb ready to get smaller. :wink:

many options with advantages and disadvantages, up to your preferences. :thumbsup:

See you later, Have Fun. :turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Prz42 on June 22, 2020, 10:49:58 PM
Hi Lancelot
This is a great project. I used Win10_2004_English_x32.iso for the source. That made the Azin project come to life. Took a little time to sort out, but I was having a hard time getting the Windows_x86 working and this does the trick. A couple to plugin made the process stop build. The Components "Search" stop the build, so work around is AgentRansack_2016.Script. The Components "SnippingTool" wouldn't run but easy fix
Code: [Select]
[Process_Normal]
If,Not,ExistVar,%OS%,IniRead,%ProjectDir%\script.project,IniVariables,OS,%OS%
Set,%t%,0
If,%OS%,Equal,Win8.1,Set,%t%,1
If,%OS%,Equal,Win10,Set,%t%,1
//Bypass version temporary
Set,%t%,1
Also added
Code: [Select]
[SnippingToolSetting]
RegHiveLoad,Tmp_Default,%RegDefault%
// Free-form Snip
If,%pScrollBox1%,Equal,Free-form,RegWrite,HKLM,0x4,"Tmp_Default\Software\Microsoft\Windows\TabletPC\Snipping Tool",CaptureMode,1
// Rectangular Snip
If,%pScrollBox1%,Equal,Rectangular,RegWrite,HKLM,0x4,"Tmp_Default\Software\Microsoft\Windows\TabletPC\Snipping Tool",CaptureMode,2
// Window Snip
If,%pScrollBox1%,Equal,Window,RegWrite,HKLM,0x4,"Tmp_Default\Software\Microsoft\Windows\TabletPC\Snipping Tool",CaptureMode,3
// Full-screen Snip (No key fot that)
// Added line
RegWrite,HKLM,0x4,"Tmp_Default\Software\Microsoft\Windows\TabletPC\Snipping Tool",IsScreenSketchBannerExpanded,0
RegHiveUnLoad,Tmp_Default
Keep up the great work :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 23, 2020, 12:39:22 AM
Thanks Prz42

Sniping Tool updated now  :thumbsup:
See: Small Green Download Button on Plugins - Reply 1: Update Plugins (http://TheOven.org/index.php?topic=2672.msg29992#msg29992)

I believe "Sniping Tool" now works out of the box. :cool:

+
I believe your other troubles is because there is something wrong at your script.project [IniVariables] OS=Win10PE
Here it works fine  :confused:
 Other words: Here [IniVariables] OS=Win10PE is available during build ?

Can you check Azin script.project :
1) at [Variables] there should not be any %OS% ?
2) at [IniVariables] there should be OS=Win10PE ?

*
Quote from: Prz42 on June 22, 2020, 10:49:58 PM
This is a great project. I used Win10_2004_English_x32.iso for the source. That made the Azin project come to life.
Thanks for the Good news.  :great:

A Summer update coming soon (after many delays) http://theoven.org/index.php?topic=3052.0

I am sure %99 of your Plugins keep working, If you notice something not working I am sure easy to fix, let me know.  :thumbsup:

Ps: For Future Azin Special questions better on Azin Topic http://theoven.org/index.php?topic=3052.0  :thumbsup:

Quote from: Prz42 on June 22, 2020, 10:49:58 PM
Keep up the great work :thumbsup:
:turtle:
Title: Re: Apps on Y-?-Drive not present at UEFI -Boot
Post by: Lancelot on June 23, 2020, 01:54:17 AM
Hi Prz42

Forget about the previous reply OS related things, there is something "interesting" I could not reproduce at first reply ...

Anyway,

Search Plugin updated now  :thumbsup:
See: Small Green Download Button on Plugins - Reply 1: Update Plugins (http://TheOven.org/index.php?topic=2672.msg29992#msg29992)

:turtle: