Quote from: aa on September 18, 2017, 06:45:19 PMIs there any chance that winbuilder get/extracted x86-VC9.7z fromanother source, rather than/only from this vcRunTimes_File.script?Since it's won't extract the valid x86-VC9.7z file from thishow you come to such wrong conclusion ?
Is there any chance that winbuilder get/extracted x86-VC9.7z fromanother source, rather than/only from this vcRunTimes_File.script?Since it's won't extract the valid x86-VC9.7z file from this
Quote from: Lancelot on September 18, 2017, 07:38:20 PMQuote from: aa on September 18, 2017, 06:45:19 PMIs there any chance that winbuilder get/extracted x86-VC9.7z fromanother source, rather than/only from this vcRunTimes_File.script?Since it's won't extract the valid x86-VC9.7z file from thishow you come to such wrong conclusion ?That's still far from conclusion, it merely just a proposition.You may call them premises or hypothesis, based on limited evidences.
So which one, precisely, do you called it wrong (or right/correct)?- winbuilder got a valid data from another source?- done other thing beside simple decoding?
I did already build Win7PESE, many times, tried with different setting.
*Quote from: aa on September 16, 2017, 11:33:44 PM asking the very busy author, what are differences between them.But by not giving required info to reproduce your troubles with reasons behind, you cause lots of time wasted.Same with nircmd on your post.
asking the very busy author, what are differences between them.
*****Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic.
Quote from: aa on September 19, 2017, 02:13:15 AMSo which one, precisely, do you called it wrong (or right/correct)?- winbuilder got a valid data from another source?- done other thing beside simple decoding?I say nothing about these on posts here.
Is there any chance that winbuilder get/extracted x86-VC9.7z fromanother source, rather than/only from this vcRunTimes_File.script?Since it's won't extract the valid x86-VC9.7z file from this script(provided that it only decodes the base64-encoded data in the script,not doing any other stuff).
Quote from: Lancelot on September 19, 2017, 07:51:30 AMQuote from: aa on September 19, 2017, 02:13:15 AMSo which one, precisely, do you called it wrong (or right/correct)?- winbuilder got a valid data from another source?- done other thing beside simple decoding?I say nothing about these on posts here.It's essentialy the same with this longer version:Quote from: aa on September 18, 2017, 06:45:19 PMIs there any chance that winbuilder get/extracted x86-VC9.7z fromanother source, rather than/only from this vcRunTimes_File.script?Since it's won't extract the valid x86-VC9.7z file from this script(provided that it only decodes the base64-encoded data in the script,not doing any other stuff).I've made it shorter so you can simply answer yes/yes or no/no.
since you wrote:Quote from: aa on September 16, 2017, 11:33:44 PMI did already build Win7PESE, many times, tried with different setting.you should already notice that file is ok.
Yet even after that you failed to reply. why?
Quote from: aa on September 16, 2017, 12:25:05 PMI found that file x86-VC9.7z is bad/corrupted.It works ok.
I found that file x86-VC9.7z is bad/corrupted.
Since reply 1 of current topic, I try to explain to you, you have your wrong assumptions and wrong conclusions. file is ok, everything is ok. Nothing corrupted. There is no bug.
Quote from: Lancelot on September 18, 2017, 07:38:20 PM*****Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic. Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic.
than asking the very busy author, what are differences between them.
When you figure out how you mistaken, let us know. If you still do not understand feedback given to you, than stop posting till you figure out.
Quote from: Lancelot on September 19, 2017, 06:51:32 PMQuote from: Lancelot on September 18, 2017, 07:38:20 PMWhen you figure out how you mistaken, let us know. If you still do not understand feedback given to you, than stop posting till you figure out.I advice you to read all topic very slowly and try to understand all feedback given to you. Give yourself some time, 10 days, 30 days ....If you insist on ignoring replies and doing your homework but instead wrote same posts again and again, better you waste your time elsewhere. If you continue I have to STOP you from wasting time of authors and readers.Hm- I thought this forums was meant to help newbies like me.If you didn't really mean to help, only wanted to feel superior, you shouldnever replied to my post in the first place, wasting my time and yours as well.Quote from: Lancelot on September 19, 2017, 06:51:32 PMAs I wrote you many timesQuote from: Lancelot on September 19, 2017, 07:51:30 AMQuote from: Lancelot on September 18, 2017, 07:38:20 PM*****Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic. Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic. and now 3 :Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic. Boasting your ego wouldn't help, tried to disgracing others, even less helpful, and immature.EDIT: <---to be deleted--->Beside, I don't think you understand about logic, if you don't even have a clue about methodology,You don't know the difference between premises and conclusion,or even difference between than and then (sigh).I really should restrain a technical discussion with an uneducated people like you.See- that wouldn't help, even drag me down to your level, and I'm not that easily agitated.(I'd really hoped, a dozen times would be enough for you to bullying others, but you never stop)<---to be deleted--->Anyway, thanks for your admiration. Imitation is one of sincerest form of flattery, whether you realized it or not,and you keep rephrasing my quotes.
Quote from: Lancelot on September 18, 2017, 07:38:20 PMWhen you figure out how you mistaken, let us know. If you still do not understand feedback given to you, than stop posting till you figure out.I advice you to read all topic very slowly and try to understand all feedback given to you. Give yourself some time, 10 days, 30 days ....If you insist on ignoring replies and doing your homework but instead wrote same posts again and again, better you waste your time elsewhere. If you continue I have to STOP you from wasting time of authors and readers.
As I wrote you many timesQuote from: Lancelot on September 19, 2017, 07:51:30 AMQuote from: Lancelot on September 18, 2017, 07:38:20 PM*****Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic. Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic. and now 3 :Refresh your personal logic integrity checking mechanism on your side to avoid reporting bad blop like current topic.
This is a hypothetical sharp and constructive discussion:Quoteme: The some-7z.script is corrupted!programmer: Why do you say that?me: According to my examination, the base64 encoded data in section [xxx] will be decoded to an invalid .7z file.programmer: Oh, that's fine, the extractor is not only decoding, but also filtering them through adler's zlib.me: Oh OK, that's make sense, thank you.-- continued --me: But why some are z-packed and the others are not?programmer: I don't know, I forgot. Maybe once I did some result-size checking, or maybe the checking is already builtin in the library.me: Yeah, amazing what your brain can do to you, isn't it?And here's the other, lame and non-constructive discussion:Quoteme: The some-7z.script is corrupted!script-kiddies: your logic is illogical, yo mama is fat!me: Uh? well- according to my examination, the base64 encoded data in section [xxx] will be decoded to an invalid .7z file.script-kiddies: your logic is illogical, yo mama is fat!me: Oh OK, I don't think that's make sense, but thank you anyway.-- continued --me: But why some are z-packed and the others are not?script-kiddies: your logic is illogical, yo mama is fat! fatter then pique!me: I agree, amazing what your brain can do to you, isn't it?
me: The some-7z.script is corrupted!programmer: Why do you say that?me: According to my examination, the base64 encoded data in section [xxx] will be decoded to an invalid .7z file.programmer: Oh, that's fine, the extractor is not only decoding, but also filtering them through adler's zlib.me: Oh OK, that's make sense, thank you.-- continued --me: But why some are z-packed and the others are not?programmer: I don't know, I forgot. Maybe once I did some result-size checking, or maybe the checking is already builtin in the library.me: Yeah, amazing what your brain can do to you, isn't it?
me: The some-7z.script is corrupted!script-kiddies: your logic is illogical, yo mama is fat!me: Uh? well- according to my examination, the base64 encoded data in section [xxx] will be decoded to an invalid .7z file.script-kiddies: your logic is illogical, yo mama is fat!me: Oh OK, I don't think that's make sense, but thank you anyway.-- continued --me: But why some are z-packed and the others are not?script-kiddies: your logic is illogical, yo mama is fat! fatter then pique!me: I agree, amazing what your brain can do to you, isn't it?