Hi Prz42thanks for the updated ATI pluginfor correct syntaxneeds commenting out or removing ---------------------------------------------------------- (Line 413)with Line 44Code: [Select]Button_ProvideFiles="Provide Files",1,8,9,207,90,22,ProvideFiles_Process,,False-->Code: [Select]Button_ProvideFiles="Provide Files",1,8,9,207,90,22,ProvideFiles_Process,0,Falsewith Line 259 Invalid RegWrite SyntaxCode: [Select]RegWrite,HKLM,0x1,Tmp_Software\Classes\tibfile\DefaultIcon,,%ProgramPath%\tib_mounter.dll,0
Line 413 doesn't do anything it is just a line ????Line 44 seems to open the provide file folder and gives explanation. ????Line 259 is a image icon. The icon shows up on the backup file. ????
Line 44 have a double comma ,,But worth pointing out..and line 259 appears to be missing quotesCode: [Select]RegWrite,HKLM,0x1,Tmp_Software\Classes\tibfile\DefaultIcon,,"C:\Program Files (x86)\Acronis\TrueImageHome\tishell.dll,-4"
The double ,, is normal.
But, APT reported them as a PEBakery Compatibility Issue..Correcting the PEBakery Compatibility Issues will just help make the plugin more versatile, without any lasting effect on winbuilder
Prz42,From you screenshot the (Icon Index Number) is Missing..Or I guess without "" one could remove the last comma 0 ( ,0 ) of the string..
needs commenting out or removing ---------------------------------------------------------- (Line 413)
with Line 44Code: [Select]Button_ProvideFiles="Provide Files",1,8,9,207,90,22,ProvideFiles_Process,,False-->Code: [Select]Button_ProvideFiles="Provide Files",1,8,9,207,90,22,ProvideFiles_Process,0,False
with Line 259 Invalid RegWrite SyntaxCode: [Select]RegWrite,HKLM,0x1,Tmp_Software\Classes\tibfile\DefaultIcon,,%ProgramPath%\tib_mounter.dll,0
HiQuoteBut, APT reported them as a PEBakery Compatibility Issue..Correcting the PEBakery Compatibility Issues will just help make the plugin more versatile, without any lasting effect on winbuilderFurther, from my perspectiveFor me, they are syntax errors, whether used in BuilderSE or PEBakeryBuilderSE ignores them, whilst PEBakery has a utility that easily identifies them, thereby giving you a chance to correct them- how could that be seen by anyone, as anything less than a positive?PEBakery doesn't require special syntax, just the correct oneI guess it will always be up to the individual coder to choose which path to follow
Edit: Note: These Issues Where Reported Not Because of an issue with the plugin for use in winbuilder PESEBut, APT reported them as a PEBakery Compatibility Issue..Correcting the PEBakery Compatibility Issues will just help make the plugin more versatile, without any lasting effect on winbuilder
but i guess its different each time